The explanation engine

Why did it move?

Something you hold drops 6%. You check the news and read "risk-off sentiment" or "profit-taking" — phrases that describe the move rather than explain it. Farlens checks twelve measurements at once and shows which one is actually doing the work.

Why "sentiment" is almost never the answer

A price move has a limited set of plausible drivers, and on any given day one or two of them dominate. It might be the whole market. It might be the sector rotating out. It might be money leaving the name specifically while the price holds up. It might be short-selling pressure that doesn't show on the chart at all. It might be a world event repricing the sector's inputs. In crypto it is frequently leverage — a funding rate that got expensive and a cascade of liquidations that followed.

Each of those is measurable, and they leave different fingerprints. A generic explanation is what you get when nobody checked.

What gets checked

All twelve measurements in the signal stack, on every name — equity or crypto — every day:

What a read looks like

The output is the composite score, the components that moved it, and a plain-language reading of which one dominates — followed by the bull and bear case, together.

Illustrative example

A worked example of the format. Not a real reading, not about any actual security, and not a recommendation.

MeasurementReadingContribution
Sector rotationSector ETF flat; the name underperformed it sharplydominant
Short volumeOff-exchange short share well above its own averagecontributing
Money flowOutflow, but milder than the price move impliesminor
TrendStill above the 200-dayneutral
Geopolitical exposureNo active event mapped to this sectornone
NarrativeDiscussion volume at baselinenone

Reading: this looks name-specific rather than sector-wide, with shorting pressure rather than broad distribution. The world-events layer contributed nothing — which is itself the answer to "was it geopolitical?"

Sometimes the honest answer is "no single driver". When the measurements disagree or all sit near neutral, Farlens says so rather than inventing a narrative. A tool that always has a confident explanation is telling you stories.

Stocks and crypto, same question

Crypto gets the same treatment plus the measurements that only exist there. "Why is bitcoin down" very often has a positioning answer rather than a news one: funding rates showed leveraged longs paying to stay in, open interest showed positions being unwound, and liquidation data showed the move being amplified by forced selling. That is a mechanically different event from spot holders selling, and it usually resolves differently. Funding rates explained · liquidations explained.

What this is not

Frequently asked

Why is my stock down today?

Usually one dominant driver among the candidates above — market, sector, money flow, shorting, an event, or the conversation. The value is in knowing which, because they resolve differently.

Why is bitcoin down today?

Check leverage before news. Funding, open interest and liquidations explain a large share of sharp crypto moves.

Do I get today's reading for free?

No. Explanation, methodology and history are open — every measurement and weight is published. Live readings on your own watchlist are the product. Join the waitlist.

Related reading

Farlens provides informational tools and aggregated public data for research purposes only. Nothing on this platform constitutes investment, financial, legal, or tax advice. Farlens is not a registered investment adviser or broker-dealer in any jurisdiction. All investment decisions are made solely by you.